$92,794, Broken Into Payouts — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account
One forex portfolio taken apart to the last dollar: 257 net trades, the Monte Carlo forecast locked before live, 41 days to first payout, the red month and the live drawdown that held.
Transcript
Ninety-two thousand, seven hundred ninety-four dollars. Every vendor will show you a number like this one. Almost none will let you take it apart. This one comes from four of our eight strategies, running together on a single one-hundred-K forex account — a combination we publish as the Champion portfolio. Twelve months, trade by trade.
We're breaking it down to the last dollar. The four inside it: Hook and Anchor on the Nasdaq, Reject and Trace on gold. Each one is a rule-based strategy, delivered as an invite-only script on TradingView — explicit entries, exits, stops, and sizing presets for every account tier. You can run any of them solo.
Stacked into a portfolio, their trades interleave — and that's where this number comes from. Two hundred fifty-seven trades, commission and slippage already deducted. Net, not the gross figure a backtester prints. We simulated fifteen hundred lives of this account. Evaluation, funding, payouts — and every payout shrinks the buffer above the drawdown floor. The median life: seventy-two payouts across three years.
Two a month. First payout, forty-one days in — with the evaluation and the buffer-building already inside that clock. Not the two-week version from the ads. Here's the part that matters. Before any real money went in, the model locked a forecast: median, forty-one thousand a year — thirteen point seven for any four months of it.
Top decile, fifty. Blown accounts — zero, in fifteen hundred paths. Then came four live months on funded accounts: thirty-one thousand, ninety-four dollars. Zero breaches. Printed next to the forecast — labeled, never blended. Every number in this table is published monthly on the site. And to be clear — four months validate a model.
They don't replace the sample. Now the part that went wrong, on schedule. One red month in twelve: July, minus thirteen hundred forty-four. It stays on the chart — without it, this isn't a year, it's a selection. The deepest drawdown of the entire period — five thousand two hundred forty-five dollars — happened live.
In June. With real money. Nobody touched anything. The exits were in the orders before the positions existed. That same quarter closed up twenty-four thousand. So why does the model say forty-one when the raw twelve months say ninety-two? Because the model lives like an account, not like a curve. It deducts every payout, enforces the drawdown floor after each one, and randomly drops a quarter of the trades from every path.
That's the number we put on the pricing page. The bigger one is context. If a vendor only shows you the bigger number — ask what happened to the floor. Everything you saw is built from the same eight strategies, across four markets — Nasdaq and gold, futures and CFDs — composed into twelve published portfolio configurations.
Forex was today's example; the futures side runs the same way. Access gets you the strategies on your own TradingView, with a fourteen-day guarantee counted from the day access is granted — reproduce the tester output, and if it doesn't match the published specification, you get your money back. Founders pricing — thirty percent off lifetime — ends August thirty-first.
The numbers are on the site. The clock is on the calendar.
Read the full write-up
All videos → · Watch on YouTube →
All figures are hypothetical or from live-tracked accounts as stated in the video. Past and simulated performance does not guarantee future results. This is educational content, not financial advice.