$92,794, Broken Into Payouts — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account — 12 Months on a 100K Prop Account
One forex portfolio taken apart to the last dollar: 257 net trades, the Monte Carlo forecast locked before live, 41 days to first payout, the red month and the live drawdown that held.
Transcript
Ninety-two thousand, seven hundred ninety-four dollars. Every vendor will show you a number like this one. Almost none will let you take it apart. This one comes from four of our eight strategies, running together on a single one-hundred-K forex account — a combination we publish as the Champion portfolio. Twelve months, trade by trade.
We're breaking it down to the last dollar. The four inside it: Hook and Anchor on the Nasdaq, Reject and Trace on gold. Each one is a rule-based strategy, delivered as an invite-only script on TradingView — explicit entries, exits, stops, and sizing presets for every account tier. You can run any of them solo.
Stacked into a portfolio, their trades interleave — and that's where this number comes from. Two hundred fifty-seven trades, commission and slippage already deducted. Net, not the gross figure a backtester prints. We simulated fifteen hundred lives of this account. Evaluation, funding, payouts — and every payout shrinks the buffer above the drawdown floor. The median life: seventy-two payouts across three years.
Two a month. First payout, forty-one days in — with the evaluation and the buffer-building already inside that clock. Not the two-week version from the ads. Here's the part that matters. Before any real money went in, the model locked a forecast: median, forty-one thousand a year — thirteen point seven for any four months of it.
Top decile, fifty. Blown accounts — zero, in fifteen hundred paths. Then came four live months on funded accounts: thirty-one thousand, ninety-four dollars. Zero breaches. Printed next to the forecast — labeled, never blended. Every number in this table is published monthly on the site. And to be clear — four months validate a model.
They don't replace the sample. Now the part that went wrong, on schedule. One red month in twelve: July, minus thirteen hundred forty-four. It stays on the chart — without it, this isn't a year, it's a selection. The deepest drawdown of the entire period — five thousand two hundred forty-five dollars — happened live.
In June. With real money. Nobody touched anything. The exits were in the orders before the positions existed. That same quarter closed up twenty-four thousand. So why does the model say forty-one when the raw twelve months say ninety-two? Because the model lives like an account, not like a curve. It deducts every payout, enforces the drawdown floor after each one, and randomly drops a quarter of the trades from every path.
That's the number we put on the pricing page. The bigger one is context. If a vendor only shows you the bigger number — ask what happened to the floor. Everything you saw is built from the same eight strategies, across four markets — Nasdaq and gold, futures and CFDs — composed into twelve published portfolio configurations.
Forex was today's example; the futures side runs the same way. Access gets you the strategies on your own TradingView, with a fourteen-day guarantee counted from the day access is granted — reproduce the tester output, and if it doesn't match the published specification, you get your money back. Founders pricing — thirty percent off lifetime — ends August thirty-first.
The numbers are on the site. The clock is on the calendar.
11 strategies, 15 portfolios, one PDF.
Every result on this site, modeled and live separately, with the preset for each account tier. One PDF, then our letters with what the systems did.
By email, from Puerto Viejo, Costa Rica. Unsubscribe anytime.
Read the full write-up
All videos → · Watch on YouTube →
All figures are hypothetical or from live-tracked accounts as stated in the video. Past and simulated performance does not guarantee future results. This is educational content, not financial advice.