PVE Index FX267.81▲ +25.36% Q3+167.81% totalPVE Index FUT176.38▲ +11.21% Q3+76.38% total
Q3 2026 · 1 Apr 2025 = 100
10 STRATEGIES 4 INSTRUMENTS · MNQ / MGC / NAS / XAU

Strategies.
Ten independent, statistically-tested edges.

Each strategy is one system on one market. Pick by the market you trade; every number below says what it did on the modeled year and on real accounts since Apr 2026.

Each strategy is a standalone automated system with its own setup logic, instrument coverage and risk profile. Portfolios stack 2–4 of these on a single account.

Every card leads with the total net (Apr 2025 – Sep 2026), aggregated across every instrument the strategy trades, with the modeled (Apr 2025 – Mar 2026) and live (Apr 2026 – Sep 2026, real account) layers underneath. Every strategy track also carries its place in the quarterly strategy ranking (edition 2026-10). Equity curves show cumulative net P&L. Click any strategy for the full instrument-by-instrument breakdown.

#1
Top-ranked track
Anchor MNQ
$86.8k
Highest total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
GAP, all tracks
98%
Highest win rate · total
Pivot MGC
10
Independent strategies
32 tracks · 4 instruments
See the strategy ranking →
All 10 strategies

Full roster

Each card aggregates the strategy across all instruments it trades. Total net is cumulative P&L Apr 2025 – Sep 2026 at 100K presets, split into the modeled (Apr 2025 – Mar 2026) and live (Apr 2026 – Sep 2026) layers. Profit factor, win rate and trade count come from the same trade lists, not from the Monte Carlo.

Open
Range Break
4 INSTRUMENTS
Range expansion + breakout at the open. Coverage on MNQ, MGC, NAS and XAU.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$79.6k
modeled +$60.3k · live +$19.3k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #4 Open MNQ (Elite)
4.71
Best PF · total (MNQ)
81.8%
Best WR · total (MNQ)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
144
Trades · total
View Open detail page →
Trace
Asymmetric R-multiple
4 INSTRUMENTS
Asymmetric R-multiple setups: small stops, outsized targets.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$77.0k
modeled +$59.4k · live +$17.5k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #5 Trace XAU (Elite)
2.42
Best PF · total (XAU)
49.3%
Best WR · total (NAS)
0.02%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
370
Trades · total
View Trace detail page →
Zone
Triple-Zone Pullback
4 INSTRUMENTS
Pullback-continuation at multi-layer confluence — a few high-selectivity setups per month.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$54.9k
modeled +$33.7k · live +$21.2k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #7 Zone XAU (Elite)
3.05
Best PF · total (XAU)
41.9%
Best WR · total (XAU)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
210
Trades · total
View Zone detail page →
GAP
Weekly Gap
4 INSTRUMENTS
Weekly-gap fill & rejection (Fri close → Sun open). Sparse, high-conviction. MNQ, MGC, NAS and XAU.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$86.8k
modeled +$56.6k · live +$30.2k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #3 GAP MGC (Elite)
4.84
Best PF · total (NAS)
55.6%
Best WR · total (MNQ)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · NAS
123
Trades · total
View GAP detail page →
Hook
Multi-leg Sweep
2 INSTRUMENTS
Multi-leg liquidity sweep. MNQ & NAS.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$27.7k
modeled +$21.6k · live +$6.0k
Instruments · MNQ · NASBest ranked track · #10 Hook NAS (Core)
2.92
Best PF · total (NAS)
58.3%
Best WR · total (MNQ)
0.04%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · NAS
54
Trades · total
View Hook detail page →
Anchor
Anchored Value
2 INSTRUMENTS
Anchored to a session reference level. Among the best risk-adjusted strategies in the roster.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$79.4k
modeled +$52.0k · live +$27.3k
Instruments · MNQ · NASBest ranked track · #1 Anchor MNQ (Elite)
4.58
Best PF · total (MNQ)
78.9%
Best WR · total (MNQ)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · NAS
307
Trades · total
View Anchor detail page →
Pivot
False Break Reversal
2 INSTRUMENTS
False-break reversal at key levels. Gold specialist (MGC + XAU).
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$9.1k
modeled +$5.5k · live +$3.6k
Instruments · XAU · MGCBest ranked track · #15 Pivot XAU (Core)
59.71
Best PF · total (XAU)
97.5%
Best WR · total (MGC)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
164
Trades · total
View Pivot detail page →
Reject
Rejection Wick
2 INSTRUMENTS
Fades exhausted, overextended moves. Gold specialist (MGC + XAU).
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$17.8k
modeled +$16.2k · live +$1.6k
Instruments · XAU · MGCBest ranked track · #18 Reject MGC (Specialist)
4.64
Best PF · total (MGC)
92.8%
Best WR · total (XAU)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
254
Trades · total
View Reject detail page →
Fade
Range Break
4 INSTRUMENTS
Extreme reversion — fades overextended moves once they visibly fail. Short holds.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$44.5k
modeled +$9.3k · live +$35.2k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #13 Fade XAU (Core)
3.83
Best PF · total (MNQ)
78.0%
Best WR · total (NAS)
0.00%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · NAS
216
Trades · total
View Fade detail page →
Drift
Range Break
4 INSTRUMENTS
Session-drift system: trades the bias between sessions, proprietary filters, scheduled exits — MNQ, MGC, NAS and XAU.
Total net · Apr 2025 – Sep 2026
+$66.1k
modeled +$38.4k · live +$27.6k
Instruments · MNQ · MGC · NAS · XAUBest ranked track · #12 Drift XAU (Core)
1.54
Best PF · total (XAU)
42.9%
Best WR · total (MNQ)
0.31%
Lowest blow / yr (MC) · XAU
755
Trades · total
View Drift detail page →
Strategy ranking · edition 2026-10
All 32 strategy tracks ranked, quarterly.
Elite · Core · Specialist · High-variance — composite of Monte Carlo median net and blow rate, plus 12-month efficiency, day-level PF and Sharpe. #1 this edition: Anchor MNQ.
Open the ranking →
Why ten strategies

Ten edges, not one.

Each strategy exploits a different, repeatable market behaviour. Because they fire on different setups, days and instruments, their losing periods rarely overlap — which is exactly what makes them combine into low-variance portfolios.

01
Different setups, different days
Open breaks the opening range, Pivot reverses false breaks at key levels, Reject fades rejection wicks, Anchor mean-reverts to session VWAP, Drift trades the bias between sessions. A flat day for one is often an active day for another.
02
Spread across 4 instruments
MNQ (micro Nasdaq), MGC (micro gold), NAS and XAU. Every strategy is tuned per instrument — the same logic behaves differently on equities vs metals, and the figures above reflect that.
03
Empirical, not modelled
Every number on this page comes from raw TradingView Strategy Tester exports over a 12-month period. Profit factor, win rate and trade count are observed results, then stress-tested with 1,500-path Monte Carlo at the portfolio level.
Methodology

How each strategy is validated

From raw trades to the figures above

1. Raw trade lists — each strategy is exported from the TradingView Strategy Tester for every instrument it trades, over the full data window: modeled Apr 2025 – Mar 2026 and live Apr – Sep 2026.

2. Aggregation — trades are combined across instruments to produce the cumulative net P&L curve and the headline stats (PF, win rate, trade count) shown on each card.

3. Profit factor & win rate — computed directly from realised trade P&L: gross profit / gross loss, and winning trades / total trades. No modelling, no curve-fitting.

4. Monte Carlo stress test — when strategies are combined into portfolios, 1,500-path block-bootstrap simulation over a 3-year horizon confirms the edge survives realistic sequencing and drawdown constraints.

See the methodology page for full statistical detail.

FAQ

Common questions

Are these the equity curves of single strategies or portfolios?
Single strategies. Each curve is the cumulative net P&L of one strategy aggregated across every instrument it trades, over the modeled + live sample (Apr 2025 – Sep 2026). Portfolios — which stack 2–4 of these on one account — are on the portfolios page.
Why do some strategies trade far more often than others?
It's by design. Reject is a high-win-rate rejection-wick fade with tight risk; Hook is a selective multi-leg sweep that takes few, high-conviction setups. Neither is "better" — they contribute different things to a portfolio.
Can I run a single strategy on its own?
Yes. The Single tier gives you one strategy on one instrument. Most users combine strategies into a portfolio for lower variance, but a standalone strategy is a valid starting point — see pricing.
Is profit factor the same as win rate?
No. Win rate is the percentage of trades that close in profit. Profit factor is gross profit divided by gross loss. A strategy like Trace can have a lower win rate but still be strongly profitable because its wins are much larger than its losses.
What period do these results cover?
Two layers taken directly from TradingView Strategy Tester exports: modeled Apr 1, 2025 — Mar 31, 2026 (frozen) and live Apr 1, 2026 — Sep 30, 2026 (real account, same presets). Past performance does not guarantee future results.

Ready to deploy?

Single unlocks one strategy on one instrument. Track Combo and Ultimate bundle multiple strategies into ready-made portfolios. Every Lifetime tier can be paid in 12 monthly instalments — full access from the first payment.