You Hit the Profit Target and Still Failed — Because of Your Best Day
A consistency rule caps how much of your profit can come from one day, so a single good day can fail an evaluation after you hit the target. How the rule works, the one division that decides it, and why the extra days a keep-trading rule adds are almost free.
Transcript
You hit the profit target. The evaluation says no. Because of your best day. A consistency rule caps how much of your profit can come from a single day. It doesn't punish your worst day.
It punishes your best one. Here's a portfolio that never runs into it. Growth, on a 100K account. Twenty-eight days, ten winning days, none above a thousand dollars. Best day: 14% of the profit.
Two strategies taking turns. Now the opposite profile. Same target, hit in four days — but one of those days is 60% of the profit. Under a strict 40% rule, that's a fail.
If the rule lets you keep trading, you add days, the share comes down, and you pass. It costs time, not the account. That's the part most people miss. If your rule lets you keep trading until the share comes down, consistency stops being a wall.
Across 1,500 simulated evaluations, almost every one that hits the target passes — for most portfolios it costs a few extra days. And those days are played on the safest stretch of the account's life: the floor is already locked, or the buffer is at its widest.
Accounts lost in that extra time: zero to three in a thousand. So read the rule before you pick the portfolio. Under a strict rule, a steadier portfolio passes far more often.
Under a keep-trading rule, the question isn't pass or fail. It's how many days.
Read the full write-up
- Why Traders Fail the Consistency Rule: The Best-Day Trap
- The formula: how much more profit your best day needs
All videos → · Watch on YouTube →
All figures are hypothetical or from live-tracked accounts as stated in the video. Past and simulated performance does not guarantee future results. This is educational content, not financial advice.