150K-Balanced 4X

BALANCED 4X4 strategies · minimized hedge risk150k FP Futures Prop · hard DD $4,500SAFE · blow 1.49%/y

Backtest: 2025-09-01 → 2026-03-31 · Live: 2026-04-01 → 2026-08-31 (Q2 full + Q3 accruing)

Open MNQ 8ct + Anchor MNQ 13ct + Open MGC 3ct + GAP MGC 10ct — single 150k FP Futures Prop account, four strategies across two instruments.

About. 150K-Balanced 4X is the return-ceiling variant of its tier: bigger size on the core component in exchange for a higher blow rate. Faster funding when it works, more tail risk when it does not.

When to use. For a funded account you can afford to re-earn: prioritises net per year and time-to-payout over survival odds. Pair it with a Balanced variant on a second account to smooth the path.

At a glance

5.80
Profit factor
+$120.1k
Net · trailing 12mo (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026)
78.0%
Trade win rate
95.5%
Viability 3y
21:1
Payouts : blow
19d
Typical TTP

Rolling last 12 months at 100K preset; forecast metrics from 1,500-path Monte Carlo, 3-year horizon. Viability 3y = % of MC paths that never hit the hard drawdown. Payouts : blow = payouts per one account blow over 3y. TTP = median days to first payout.

Live since Q2'26+$45,275 · 50 trades · 5 months · 85% of modeled · max DD $5,198

Equity curve · backtest + live

Joint daily P&L applied to the $150,000 starting balance, log scale. Gray = pre-publication (2025-09-01 → 2026-03-31); accent = live (2026-04-01 → 2026-08-31), right of the “LIVE →” marker. Dotted red = hard DD floor ($145,500); dotted green = eval target ($159,000).

$140k$160k$180k$200k$220k$240k$260k$280kLIVE Q2'26 →2025-092025-122026-032026-06
Blow / yr: 1.49% (MC)·Sharpe: 5.71·Net / yr P50: $79.2k·Max DD: $5,212 (115.8% of hard)·Total P&L: +$120,090 (BT +$74,815 · live +$45,275)

Quarterly breakdown

Sep’25–Q1’26 pre-publication (Q3’25 partial, exports from 04.09.2025) · live since Q2’26 · Q3’26 accruing (2 of 3 months). Portfolio as sized.

QuarterNetWRTradesMax DD (EOD)
Q3'25 · 1 mo+$2,43880.0%10$819
Q4'25+$24,60681.0%42$4,104
Q1'26+$47,77278.9%57$3,400
Q2'26+$38,37183.3%24$1,200
Q3'26 · 2 mo+$6,90465.4%26$5,198

What's running

StrategyQtyRole
Open MNQ8 ctOpening-range breakout on the Nasdaq micro — primary return driver.
Anchor MNQ13 ctSession-anchored continuation on the Nasdaq micro — highest trade count, smooths the equity curve.
Open MGC3 ctOpening-range breakout on micro gold — small, uncorrelated sleeve.
GAP MGC10 ctWeekend-gap setups on micro gold — low-frequency, high-conviction entries.
150K-Balanced 4X TradeZella analytics
Verified in TradeZellaTrailing 12 months (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026) · backtest Sep ’25–Q1’26 + live since Q2’26 · net ≈ +$120.1k

TradeZella merges partial exits into one position, so its trade count runs below the TradingView trade list; net P&L matches to the dollar.

Full metrics

58.7
Payouts / yr (median)
75%
Day win rate
1.5%
Blow / yr
8.24
Sortino

Net / yr range · P25–P75 (1,500-path Monte Carlo)

PercentileNet / yrMeaning
P25$72.8kWeak year — bottom quartile of simulated paths
P50$79.2kMedian expectation
P75$86.2kStrong year — top quartile

Day-level performance

75%
Day win rate
+$120.1k
Net · last 12mo realized
58.7
Payouts / yr (median)
19d
Typical time-to-payout

Risk-adjusted ratios

5.71
Sharpe (daily, ann.)
8.24
Sortino
5.80
Profit factor
$5,212
Max DD EOD · 115.8% of hard
23.04
Calmar
159
Trades · 12mo

How these numbers were calculated

Layer 1 · Verifiable

Trade counts, win rates, profit factors and drawdown come directly from the TradingView Strategy Tester for the presets shown. Live-phase figures (since Q2’26, through Aug’26) are live-tracked and modeled results. Both reproduce 1:1.

Layer 2 · Computed

DD%, vs-modeled ratios and percentile breakdowns are computed from the same trade list using standard methodology — reproducible in Excel or Python.

Layer 3 · Modeled

Time-to-payout, Net $/yr ranges and modeled blow rate come from a 1,500-path Monte Carlo over a 3-year horizon. Block bootstrap (5-day blocks) preserves streak autocorrelation.

Hedge-risk verification

This composition stacks two strategies per instrument, which most futures prop firms treat as a hedging risk: if two systems ever hold opposite-direction positions on the same instrument at the same time, the account can breach the no-hedging rule. The 4X composition was selected to minimize exactly that. Across twelve months of modeled trade lists, the paired strategies on each instrument were checked bar-by-bar for opposite-direction overlap, and this pairing was chosen from the full 21 × 21 pair space for the lowest joint drawdown with minimal overlap exposure. Minimal is not zero: live signals are generated independently, so a brief opposite-direction overlap remains possible. Before deploying, confirm how your firm defines and enforces its hedging rule — rule wording differs between firms and changes over time.

Why do some weeks pass without a single trade?

All four component strategies are selective by design, and one of them — GAP on MGC — only acts on weekend gaps, so it can sit idle for weeks. Quiet stretches are part of the modeled cadence, not a malfunction: the trade count you see in the tables above already includes them. The practical consequence is on the firm side — some accounts require a minimum number of trading days per payout cycle, and a quiet week slows that clock. Check your firm’s minimum-activity rule before choosing this composition if payout speed is the priority.

Risk disclosure

150K-Balanced 4X's blow rate is 1.49% per year. Empirical maximum drawdown on the backtest (Sep 2025 – Aug 2026) was $5,212 — 115.8% of the hard DD budget; live-quarter max DD $5,198. The lower-quartile (P25) outcome is $72.8k/yr. Trade-WR 78.0% ≈ 78 of 100 trades profitable. Day-WR 75%.

Get 150K-Balanced 4X + everything else.

The Ultimate tier includes all 9 strategies on all 4 instruments plus every published portfolio configuration — with sizing presets, TradingView invite access and monthly updates.