FUTURES PROP + FOREX PROP

Pivot

False Break Reversal

Pivot trades failed breakouts at key levels. Entries trigger on a sweep followed by rejection back inside the level; three scaled targets exit progressively as the trapped move unwinds. Backtest Q2'25–Q1'26 + live Q2'26: best PF ∞ (XAU), trailing 12 months (Jul 2025 – Jun 2026) +$11,150 combined · live since Q2'26 +$6,027 at 100K presets.

Performance data note: All TradingView charts and equity curves shown below are from 100k Futures Prop account (for MNQ/MGC) or 100k Forex Prop (for NAS/XAU), for visual comparability across strategies. Statistics in tables may reflect best-fit account size per strategy from our sizing methodology.
Instruments: MGC XAU

At a glance

Best profit factor · XAU
100.0%
Best win rate · XAU
+$6.7k
Best net · last 12mo · MGC
100.0%
Best viability 3y · MGC
325d
Best TTP · MGC
∞:1
Best payouts : blow · MGC

Best-performing instrument per metric (max 3 from one instrument). Rolling last 12 months at 100K preset; forecast metrics from 1,500-path Monte Carlo, 3-year horizon. Viability 3y = % of MC paths that never hit the hard drawdown. Payouts : blow = payouts per one account blow over 3y. TTP = median days to first payout.

Pivot · MGC

PF 217.52 · WR 94.8% · +$6,712 trailing 12molive since Q2'26
Pivot MGC live chart — 5-min, trade markers
Live chart5-min · MGC · PV-Pivot-MGC
Pivot MGC equity curve — TradingView Strategy Tester
Equity curve · TradingView Strategy TesterBacktest Q2'25–Q1'26 + Live since Q2'26 · 100K preset

Equity curve · backtest + live

Daily P&L applied to the $100,000 starting balance at the 100K preset (3 ct), log scale. Gray = backtest (2025-04-01 → 2026-03-31); accent = live (2026-04-01 → 2026-07-31).

$100k$102k$104k$106k$108kLIVE Q2'26 →2025-042025-072025-102026-012026-042026-07
Backtest: +$4,459·Live since Q2'26: +$2,635 · pace 177%·Max DD (EOD): $0·Sharpe: 2.74

TradingView performance summary · trailing 12 months (Jul 2025 – Jun 2026)

217.52
Profit factor
94.8%
Win rate
+$6,712
Net · +6.71%
58
Trades · 55W/3L
100.0%
Day win rate
0%
Max DD · % of hard
Live since Q2'26+$2,635 · 20 trades · 4 months · 177% of backtest pace

Quarterly breakdown · full history since Q2'25, live since Q2'26

QuarterPhaseNetWRTradesMax DD (EOD)
Q2'25backtest+$382100.0%3$0
Q3'25backtest+$36880.0%15$0
Q4'25backtest+$2,297100.0%19$0
Q1'26backtest+$1,412100.0%4$0
Q2'26 livelive+$2,635100.0%20$0
Q3'26 live · 1 molive+$00$0

Drawdowns are EOD basis; intrabar peak-to-trough runs higher. Q3'26 is accruing (1 of 3 months).

Stats · trailing 12 months

Avg win / lossW:LLargest win / lossMax DD EODSharpeSortinoCalmarAvg bars
$123 / $1012.30$723 / $12$0 (0.00%)2.746.9
Pivot MGC TradeZella analytics
Verified in TradeZellaTrailing 12 months (Jul 2025 – Jun 2026) · backtest Q3'25–Q1'26 + live Q2'26 · Zella score, calendar & daily P&L

TradeZella merges partial exits into one position, so its trade count runs below the TradingView trade list; net P&L matches to the dollar.

Account sizing · Monte Carlo 1,500 paths × 3y

AccountQtyBlow/yNet/y P50 (MC)Median TTPStatus
100K FP3 ct0.00%$3,142325 dSAFE
150K FP3 ct0.00%$3,142447 dSAFE

Pivot · XAU

PF ∞ · WR 100.0% · +$4,438 trailing 12molive since Q2'26
Pivot XAU live chart — 5-min, trade markers
Live chart5-min · XAU · PV-Pivot-XAU
Pivot XAU equity curve — TradingView Strategy Tester
Equity curve · TradingView Strategy TesterBacktest Q2'25–Q1'26 + Live since Q2'26 · 100K preset

Equity curve · backtest + live

Daily P&L applied to the $100,000 starting balance at the 100K preset (0.21 lot), log scale. Gray = backtest (2025-04-01 → 2026-03-31); accent = live (2026-04-01 → 2026-07-31).

$100k$102k$104k$106k$108kLIVE Q2'26 →2025-042025-072025-102026-012026-042026-07
Backtest: +$2,763·Live since Q2'26: +$3,392 · pace 368%·Max DD (EOD): $0·Sharpe: 2.88

TradingView performance summary · trailing 12 months (Jul 2025 – Jun 2026)

Profit factor
100.0%
Win rate
+$4,438
Net · +4.44%
41
Trades · 41W/0L
100.0%
Day win rate
0%
Max DD · % of hard
Live since Q2'26+$3,392 · 22 trades · 4 months · 368% of backtest pace

Quarterly breakdown · full history since Q2'25, live since Q2'26

QuarterPhaseNetWRTradesMax DD (EOD)
Q2'25backtest+$313100.0%3$0
Q3'25backtest+$00$0
Q4'25backtest+$912100.0%6$0
Q1'26backtest+$1,538100.0%15$0
Q2'26 livelive+$1,987100.0%20$0
Q3'26 live · 1 molive+$1,405100.0%2$0

Drawdowns are EOD basis; intrabar peak-to-trough runs higher. Q3'26 is accruing (1 of 3 months).

Stats · trailing 12 months

Avg win / lossW:LLargest win / lossMax DD EODSharpeSortinoCalmarAvg bars
$108 / $0$543 / $9$0 (0.00%)2.8811.2
Pivot XAU TradeZella analytics
Verified in TradeZellaTrailing 12 months (Jul 2025 – Jun 2026) · backtest Q3'25–Q1'26 + live Q2'26 · Zella score, calendar & daily P&L

TradeZella merges partial exits into one position, so its trade count runs below the TradingView trade list; net P&L matches to the dollar.

Account sizing · Monte Carlo 1,500 paths × 3y

AccountQtyBlow/yNet/y P50 (MC)Median TTPStatus
100K FP0.21 lot0.00%$1,977532 dSAFE
200K FP0.3 lot0.00%$2,824756 dSAFE

Risk disclosure

Backtest Q2'25–Q1'26 plus live Q2'26 at the stated presets. Past performance, simulated or live, does not guarantee future results. Futures and CFD trading involves substantial risk of loss; prop-firm accounts add breach rules (daily/EOD drawdown) that can terminate an account regardless of long-term edge. Size accordingly.

How Pivot works

Pivot trades the failed breakout. Key levels act as stop magnets — price often pushes just far enough through to harvest clustered stops before reversing. The strategy is built around capturing that sweep-and-reverse, not the breakout itself.

Setups that don't fail are skipped. When the failure prints — sweep, then rejection back inside the level — the trade is opened, and three scaled targets (T1/T2/T3) exit as the trapped move unwinds.

The result: zero modeled blow rate across both MGC variants (100K and 150K Futures Prop). Trade-off is long time-to-payout — P50 TTP 331d on 100K MGC, 459d on 150K MGC — and modest BEST/y by Trace/Reject standards ($5.4k on 100K MGC P90). Pivot is a build-the-base strategy, not a quick-funded one. The XAU Forex Prop variant has lower viability (66.5%) and should be operated with realistic expectations — disclosed transparently.

Methodology

How these numbers were calculated

Layer 1 · Verifiable

Trade counts, win rates, profit factors, drawdown values come directly from TradingView Strategy Tester for the baseline preset. Verify by running the strategy in your own TradingView after purchase — numbers match 1:1.

Layer 2 · Computed

DD%, SL%, Pass:Blow ratio and percentile breakdowns are computed from the same trade list using industry-standard methodology. Reproducible in Excel or Python.

Layer 3 · Modeled

Time-to-payout, Pay/y, Net $/y, Blow rate, and Viability come from a 1,500-path Monte Carlo v6 simulation over a 3-year horizon. Block bootstrap (5-day blocks) preserves serial autocorrelation of trade streaks.

Reproducibility: Raw trade lists for every strategy × instrument and the Monte Carlo model source data are available on request for audit. Email support@puravidaedge.com.

Get Pivot + 7 more strategies.

Every Puravida Edge plan includes all 8 strategies and ongoing updates. Founders pricing: limited early-supporter Lifetime spots at 30% off.